Fujinon Binoculars
We take a look at some Fujinon binoculars
A video gear review from GearWebsites.com
http://www.GearWebsites.com
See our gear review blog
http://gearreviews.wordpress.com
Visit Us on Facebook:
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Gear-Reviewsnet/89284987089
Gear-Reviets.net on Twitter;
http://twitter.com/GearBuyersGuide
Duration : 0:9:16
June 15 2010 02:02 pm | binoculars
June 15th, 2010 at 2:02 pm
A very cool
A very cool
June 15th, 2010 at 2:02 pm
@dvamateur If all …
@dvamateur If all I’m looking for is the time, I’ll take the Timex… or two…
I understand the difference in quality. I just have very little experience with optics.
June 15th, 2010 at 2:02 pm
There’s no zoom …
There’s no zoom here, and it shouldn’t be. I have the 12×60 model, as well as all the FMT-SX sizes: 7×50, 10×50, and 16×70. They all perform on par, and the 16×70 as well as the 12×60 HB show yellow fringe around the full moon. But these chromatic abberrations are what one pays for brighness. Anyway, I am stunned that the 12×60 HB are as birght as the porro prism FMT-SX series. That’s quite remarcable. And the fit and finish is second to none, too.
June 15th, 2010 at 2:02 pm
@rayh53 What …
@rayh53 What justifies a cost of a Rolex vs. Casio watch? They both show time quite accurately.
June 15th, 2010 at 2:02 pm
Kind of a unique …
Kind of a unique binocular, beautifully made. What is interesting, they are very bright for a roof-prism design. Cause the same yellow-lime colored ring around the full Moon, in the same way that the 16×70 FMT-SX creates. That’s a drawback for brighness. All these are definitely bargain compared to the German models. Thanks for posting this video, I am a big fan of Fujinon brand. I got 8×42 CD, 12×60 HB, and FMT-SX: 7×50, 10×50, and 16×70. I also like the Nikon IF series: 7×10 and 18×80.
June 15th, 2010 at 2:02 pm
@ monkeyboy4746
…
@ monkeyboy4746
Good points, thanks
June 15th, 2010 at 2:02 pm
@rayh53 Low light …
@rayh53 Low light performance, the ability to see fainter objects better. Shock resistance, most upper end binocs have better shock resistance in case you drop them. The ability to have them fixed if you do drop them, better customer support. Most higher end binocs can be tripod mounted. Better edge performance, objects at the edge of field are sharper. Some expensive binocs are waterproof. Better eye relief (some) if you use them with glasses. Better color, no purple halos around objects.
June 15th, 2010 at 2:02 pm
HD and regular TV ..
HD and regular TV ..
June 15th, 2010 at 2:02 pm
Go to a good …
Go to a good Sporting Goods Store, and take some time to look through them.
Clarity.
Brightness.
Field of View.
The most important is Clarity. If you use Binos, the money is well spent. More than any other kind of product – with Optics, you pretty much really do get what you pay for.
June 15th, 2010 at 2:02 pm
Steiners are very …
Steiners are very good. But for the same or less, get the Vortex at the same price tier and you’ll get brighter glass, same clarity, and better customer support should you have any problems.
June 15th, 2010 at 2:02 pm
I”ve never owned a …
I”ve never owned a ‘good’ pair, what is the difference between a $70 pair and a $700 pair? What would justify the cost difference? Thanks!
June 15th, 2010 at 2:02 pm
what do u say about …
what do u say about STEINER binoculars?
June 15th, 2010 at 2:02 pm
very detailed …
very detailed review. thanks!